MedCore Health · HealthTech · User Research

Reducing patient drop-off by 62%.

A digital health platform was losing patients at the appointment booking step. We found out why and fixed it.

Client

MedCore Health

Industry

HealthTech

Services

User Research, UX Redesign

Duration

10 weeks

Healthcare digital interface on screen
62% Reduction in patient drop-off at booking
18 User interviews conducted in 2 weeks
Increase in appointment completion rate
What 18 patients actually said
01

"I got to the insurance page and just closed it. I hadn't even booked anything yet — why do they need that already?"

Trust gap: premature commitment ask
02

"It looked like a billing system, not a doctor. Everything was grey and official. I wasn't sure if I was booking an appointment or filing a claim."

Tone mismatch: clinical vs. caring
03

"I wanted to know if this was actually the right service for me before I gave them anything. There was nowhere that explained that."

Value gap: no context before commitment
Research session — team reviewing patient interview notes on a whiteboard Wireframe flow for the redesigned appointment booking journey

Left: Synthesis session mapping 18 interviews to key anxiety moments. Right: Wireframe of the restructured booking flow.

The challenge

MedCore Health had built a capable digital health platform, but patients were abandoning the appointment booking flow at an alarming rate. The team had tried simplifying the form, changing button colours, and A/B testing copy. Nothing moved the needle. They came to us when they'd run out of assumptions to test.

What we found

The problem wasn't the form. It was trust. Patients, particularly those managing chronic conditions, were stopping when asked for insurance details before they understood what they were signing up for. The platform looked clinical and transactional. It felt like a billing system, not a healthcare provider.

We uncovered this through 18 in-depth interviews conducted over two weeks, supplemented by session recordings and a heuristics audit of the existing flow. Three distinct anxiety points emerged, all tied to information architecture and tone of voice, not UI complexity.

"The problem was never the form. Patients stopped because the platform asked for their trust before it had earned it."

What we built

We restructured the onboarding flow to lead with value before asking for anything in return. Insurance details moved to step three. We rewrote the microcopy throughout to match how patients actually think about their health: conversational and reassuring rather than administrative. The visual language shifted to reflect care, not bureaucracy.

The redesign was handed to the MedCore development team with annotated component specs, a tone-of-voice guide, and a research repository they could continue to draw on. Sixty-two percent fewer patients dropped off within the first month of launch.

Redesigned healthcare platform — clean patient-centred interface

The redesigned booking flow: value-led, trust-first, insurance details deferred to step three.

Next case study Nanthi